PROTECT BWCAW'S ROYAL LAKE FROM SNOWMOBILE ROUTE Posted Nov. 29, 2005
Friends’ members and allies are urged to contact the Superior National Forest before Dec. 17 and weigh in on a proposed snowmobile trail near the BWCAW. The new route is being offered as a compromise to snowmobilers who had been illegally crossing the far eastern tip of the wilderness en route from McFarland Lake to South Fowl Lake since the 1960s.
While the Forest Service is not obligated to provide a replacement trail, the Friends is supporting the option called "Alternative 4" because it is the option that puts snowmobiles farthest from the BWCAW and reduces the amount of noise reaching the wilderness.
Under Alternative 4, a new snowmobile trail would follow existing road corridors and safely take snowmobile riders to South Fowl Lake. Please contact the Forest Service and urge it to choose Alternative 4 rather than the more destructive option, Alternative 2. Send comments before Dec. 17 to: Dennis Neitzke Gunflint District Ranger 2020 West Highway 61 Grand Marais, MN 55604 Fax: (218) 387-3246 E-mail: comments-eastern-superior-gunflint@fs.fed.us
Or forward the sample letter below to the Forest Service at comments-eastern-superior-gunflint@fs.fed.us and Minnesota DNR Commissioner Gene Merriam at gene.merriam@dnr.state.mn.us.
Message text If you wish you may edit the text below. Dennis Neitzke Gunflint District Ranger Superior National Forest 2020 W. Highway 61 Grand Marais, MN 55604 Dear Mr. Neitzke: I am writing to support the “Alternative 4” for the new snowmobile route from McFarland Lake to South Fowl Lake. While Superior National Forest is not obligated to create a replacement trail for the illegal one now crossing the BWCAW, Alternative 4 puts snowmobiles farthest from the BWCAW and reduces the amount of noise reaching the wilderness. Alternative 4 also reduces the potential for accidents and has less impact on plants and wildlife. By creating a trail parallel to Cook County Highway 16, it removes snowmobiles from the road and minimizes the risk of accidents between snowmobiles and cars. Likewise, Alternative 4 has minimal impact on wildlife habitat and rare plants compared to other alternatives because it does not cause as much disturbance to the land. Meanwhile, I strongly urge you to resist choosing Alternative 2. This misguided option would construct an unnecessary trail across a bluff which is close to the BWCAW, threaten 21 rare plants in the area, bring noise into the Boundary Waters, and risk continued illegal riding across the wilderness because the new trail intersects with the old one. If a snowmobile trail must be built, I urge you to conduct a full environmental impact statement (EIS) before a decision is made and ultimately select Alternative 4.